More and more frequent attempts are being made to overreach when it comes to privacy controls. Some of the reasoning behind proposals like the most recentĀ #chatcontrolĀ might even seem to be based on legitimate concerns. Though what would be relinquished in exchange for this āsecurityā is simply too costly to consider.
Private corporations are becoming evermore intrusive as the digital age evolves. While governments are here to serve us, actors from the private sector typically have much less obligation to exercise any restraint when it comes to respecting individualās privacy in an evermore digital world.
š©šŖ Die EU plant mit der #Chatkontrolle die anlasslose Echtzeit-MassenĆ¼berwachung aller deiner E-Mails und Nachrichten mit Meldung verdƤchtiger Inhalte an die Polizei. Worum es geht, zeigt unser Video.
— Patrick Breyer #JoinMastodon (@echo_pbreyer) March 15, 2021
Rette das #digitaleBriefgeheimnis: https://t.co/AbQM2y0hXP pic.twitter.com/FqTRGrwGHY
As it turns out, some data privacy news is making recent headlines in the US as well. On March 2, 2021, the Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA) was signed into law in Virginia. Now the second state behind California to enact comprehensive consumer privacy legislation. The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act will go into effect on January 1, 2023.
The VCDPA creates a rights-based regime similar to the EUās GDPR and Californiaās CCPA. In that vein, the VCDPA provides six specific rights for Virginia consumers:
Ā Ā Ā Ā ā¢ The right to access their data
Ā Ā Ā Ā ā¢ The right to correct their data
Ā Ā Ā Ā ā¢ The right to delete their dataĀ
Ā Ā Ā Ā ā¢ The right to data portability
Ā Ā Ā Ā ā¢ The right to opt-out of certain uses of their data, including sale, targeted advertising, and other forms of profiling
Ā Ā Ā Ā ā¢ The right to appeal a controllerās decision with regard to a consumerās request to invoke the rights listed above.
While this may be positive for Virginia, it also highlights how big an issue data privacy remains for the rest of the United States due to there being no clear, blanket regulatory framework.
Most of the US still lacks any kind of data privacy law. Other states now likely to followĀ California and Virginiaās emphasis on privacyĀ as soon as this year include Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, New York, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Ohio and Washington. This appears to be a step in the right direction, but itās also a bit confusing when paired with news likeĀ #chatcontrol and itās consequences.
Of course weāre talking about two different countries here, but at the end of the day weāre also discussing the likely shared fate of our collective world wide web. What good is an individual having their data under ācontrolā, made āsafeā, and kept āprivateā only in principle, and only from designated groups? Without encryption, without the potential for true privacy, none of this would actually be the case. If the data weāre presumed to have control over is being made off limits for mega-corps to build user models, sell more ads, and guide social behavior, then what is it being gathered for, and by who?
Majority of the European Parliament welcomes the Commission's intention to oblige e-mail, messaging and chat providers to search all private messages for allegedly illegal material and report to the police (#chatcontrol) by 580:76:37. pic.twitter.com/Z9A2VIW0TT
— Patrick Breyer #JoinMastodon (@echo_pbreyer) March 13, 2021
āThe End of the Privacy of Digital CorrespondenceāāThe EU wants to have all private chats, messages, and emails automatically searched for suspicious content, generally and indiscriminately. The stated aim: To prosecute child pornography. The result: Mass surveillance through fully automated real-time messaging and chat control and the end of secrecy of digital correspondence.ā- Patrick Breyer
Some people have devoted their lives to emphasizing an individual's right to data privacy, as well as the gaining and retaining of crucial freedoms. People who have had plenty of time to think this through. Probably not a bad idea to revisit their most essential takeaway on such matters...
āIf we donāt have privacy, what weāre losing is the ability to make mistakes, weāre losing the ability to be ourselves. Privacy is the fountainhead of all other rights. Freedom of speech doesnāt have a lot of meaning if you canāt have a quiet space, a space within yourself, your mind, your community, your friends, your family, to decide what it is you actually want to say.ā"Arguing that you donāt care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing that you donāt care about free speech because you have nothing to say.āāBecause privacy isnāt about something to hide. Privacy is about something to protect. Thatās who you are.ā"Privacy is baked into our language, our core concepts of government and self in every way. Itās why we call it 'private property.' Without privacy you donāt have anything for yourself."- Edward Snowden
Patrick does a great job breaking this all down. Be sure to check out his twitter, follow, and share.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Majority of the European Parliament welcomes the Commission's intention to oblige e-mail, messaging and chat providers to search all private messages for allegedly illegal material and report to the police (<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/chatcontrol?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#chatcontrol</a>) by 580:76:37. <a href="https://t.co/Z9A2VIW0TT">pic.twitter.com/Z9A2VIW0TT</a></p>— Patrick Breyer #JoinMastodon (@echo_pbreyer) <a href="https://twitter.com/echo_pbreyer/status/1370642492899667968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 13, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>